I fail to see how simply pointing out that anyone who votes for McSame will get the government THEY selected is somehow "name-calling" nor "taking names". Of course, I'm very unpracticed at the Clinton camp's style of projection (Geraldine Ferraro claiming that she was a victim of racism, anyone?), so maybe I'm missing something.
I'm simply pointing out that, should you vote for McClone and he wins, then you shouldn't bitch at his actions while he's POTUS. After all, you would have gotten what your vote said you wanted - namely, McCranky as POTUS.
If pointing out that the sky is blue, grass is green, and fire is hot is somehow "name-calling", then we have highly differing definitions of that term.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2008-06-05 07:17 pm (UTC)I'm simply pointing out that, should you vote for McClone and he wins, then you shouldn't bitch at his actions while he's POTUS. After all, you would have gotten what your vote said you wanted - namely, McCranky as POTUS.
If pointing out that the sky is blue, grass is green, and fire is hot is somehow "name-calling", then we have highly differing definitions of that term.