![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
David just asked me,
As I recall, there's not a law like MA's in CA which would ban out-of-state couples.
I dared Dave to head downstairs and whistle "Chapel of Love" around his phobic Bother-in-Law (aka a blood relation of mine I'd rather not admit or claim).
It feels great to celebrate now, but I fear this victory may be short lived - the fundagelicals will be out in force in Nov. to try again to take this away.
"I wonder how fast the Wedding Chapel at Disneyland is going to book up?"
As I recall, there's not a law like MA's in CA which would ban out-of-state couples.
I dared Dave to head downstairs and whistle "Chapel of Love" around his phobic Bother-in-Law (aka a blood relation of mine I'd rather not admit or claim).
It feels great to celebrate now, but I fear this victory may be short lived - the fundagelicals will be out in force in Nov. to try again to take this away.
no subject
Amendments that are crafted to remove now-exiting rights tend to not have a very good chance of getting anywhere.
no subject
They tried and failed here. After a couple of years of same-sex marriage, with the sky staying firmly in place, most folks in MA tended to look at it as a non-issue...especially in light of other important stuff going on that actually *did* affect them...
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Unfortunately, initiative constitutional amendments only need 50% plus 1 to pass and can only be repealed by the voters.
It strikes me that constitutional amendments should require 2/3 of the voters to approve.