Crypto SnakeOil: Privacy Inside

[furrbear]

From Schneier:

I'm just going to quote without comment:

About the file: the text message file encrypted with a symmetric key combine 3 modes

1st changing the original text with random (white noise) and PHR (Pure Human Randomness) shuffle command , move and replace instruction combine with the key from mode 1 (white noise) and 2 (PHR)

2nd mode ­ xor PHR - Pure Human random ( or ROEE Random Oriented Enhanced Encryption) with a TIME set of instruction , and a computational temporary set of instructions to produce a real one time PAD when every time ,

Text will transform to a cipher the last will be different

3rd mode ­ xor WNS - White Noise Signal with a TIME set of instruction , and a computational temporary set of instructions to produce a real one time PAD when every time ,

Text will transform to a cipher the last will be different

4th Reconstructs file, levels and dimensions to a
this is a none mathematical with zero use of calculation algorithm - so no brute force , Rainbow Crack , or gpu cuda nvidia brute force crack can be applied on this technology . Sorry you have to find a new way to crack chaos theory for that.

We use 0% of any mathematical calculation algorithm ­ so we can perform any ware with unparalleled strength

Key Strength - 1million bit or more
Speed performance 400% faster Compeer to AES
MPU use - Mathematical Process Unit in CPU use 3% - 7% only
Overhead of the file from original 5% +/- (original+5%) +/-
A combination of mode 1 and 2 applied with a new variation of XOR - to perform the encrypted message

Anyone have any ideas?

The Stupid!!! It burns!!!!

Comments

[urbear]

I'm not a crypto geek, and certainly no mathematician, but it seems pretty clear to me that this is about 80% meaningless babble. Correct?

And isn't a one-time pad (not PAD - wrong capitalization) pretty much invulnerable all by itself?

[sultmhoor.livejournal.com]

Not completely meaningless babble, but obtuse and wrong none the less.

[dfwruffplay.livejournal.com]

Um.. I'm neither a computer geek, nor a mathematician.. but...

This sounds rather like the babblings of a schizophrenic on a Law & Order: SVU episode I seem to remember...

[tecknow.livejournal.com]

"Pure human randomness"

So this technique isn't vegan friendly, then?